Shemuel Gallardo Vivar is a Filipino monarchist, aristocrat & conservative (moderate conservatism). Admin of the Facebook page, Pilipinas: Mga Katutubong “Dugong Bughaw”. Shem is currently serving at the royal court of Sulu. Shem is also a CulinaryGrad, Humss12grad, Pre-Colonial Advocate, LGBTQIA member & admirer of Animist-Hinduist-Buddhist arts history philosophy heritage & etc. A descendant of The Vivar Clan of Kamaligan (Camalig) & Pinag Gubatan (Guinubatan), Albay of Las Islas Filipinas. A line of Catholic Maguinoo (Nobility).
“The outcome of most revolutions, populism or mob rule (Demagoguery) throughout its history can do more unexpected damage. We need educated voters that will vote to remove these individuals in power & not torches or sickles. ALL LEGITIMACY ARE BASED ON SOME SORT OF SOCIAL CONTRACT. A BARGAIN BETWEEN THE RULER AND THE GOVERN. INSTEAD OF ADVOCATING FOR ANARCHY (FRENCH, MAO, DERG OR ETC.) REVOLUTIONS WE MUST STILL CHOSE THE MORE PEACEFUL AND VIABLE OPTION…THE LOT…AKA “THE BALLOT”. USE UR RESPECTIVE RIGHTS TO CAST THE LOT (VOTE) TO DETHRONE THOSE IN POWER.” – @shemuelgallardovivar888 sultanateofsulu.org sgv.ecseachamber.org www.suluarbitration.com revolutions frenchrevolution floodcontrol pilipinas ph
About: Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo and The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl.
Part2: Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl. featuring: ‘Why Monarchies Are Still Relevant and Useful in the 21st Century by Akhilesh Pillalamarri’, ‘Why we should choose monarchy | Noah Wiener | TEDxYouth@ISPrague’ and ‘Why did people help Cortez to bring down the Aztec Empire? by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar’ and MANY MORE…
Different Point of Views about Monarchism and its Importance and Contribution in Societal development…
I. Why Monarchies Are Still Relevant and Useful in the 21st Century
Think monarchies are bad? Think again. June 4, 2014
Credit: Wikimedia Commons
The institution of monarchy has been back in the news lately, with the abdication of the erstwhile Spanish king Juan Carlos I and the ascension of his son, Felipe (Philip) VI. Elsewhere in the world, monarchies still make the news and shape events in places as far apart as Thailand, Bhutan, Belgium, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia. To many contemporary readers, monarchies seem to be purposeless antiquated relics, anachronisms that ought to eventually give way to republics.
On the contrary, nothing can be farther from the truth. Monarchies have an extremely valuable role to play, even in the 21st century. If anything their number should be added to rather than subtracted from. To understand why, it is important to consider the merits of monarchy objectively without resorting to the tautology that countries ought to be democracies because they ought to be democracies.
There are several advantages in having a monarchy in the 21st century. First, as Serge Schmemann argues in The New York Times, monarchs can rise above politics in the way an elected head of state cannot. Monarchs represent the whole country in a way democratically elected leaders cannot and do not. The choice for the highest political position in a monarchy cannot be influenced by and in a sense beholden to money, the media, or a political party.
Secondly and closely related to the previous point is that in factitious countries like Thailand, the existence of a monarch is often the only thing holding the country back from the edge of civil war. Monarchs are especially important in multiethnic countries such as Belgium because the institution of monarchy unites diverse and often hostile ethnic groups under shared loyalty to the monarch instead of to an ethnic or tribal group. The Habsburg dynasty held together a large, prosperous country that quickly balkanized into almost a dozen states of no power without it. If the restoration of the erstwhile king of Afghanistan, Zahir Shah, widely respected by all Afghans, went through after the overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, perhaps Afghanistan would have more quickly risen above the factionalism and rivalry between various warlords.
Third, monarchies prevent the emergence of extreme forms of government in their countries by fixing the form of government. All political leaders must serve as prime ministers or ministers of the ruler. Even if actual power lies with these individuals, the existence of a monarch makes it difficult to radically or totally alter a country’s politics. The presence of kings in Cambodia, Jordan, and Morocco holds back the worst and more extreme tendencies of political leaders or factions in their countries. Monarchy also stabilizes countries by encouraging slow, incremental change instead of extreme swings in the nature of regimes. The monarchies of the Arab states have established much more stable societies than non-monarchic Arab states, many of which have gone through such seismic shifts over the course of the Arab Spring.
Fourth, monarchies have the gravitas and prestige to make last-resort, hard, and necessary decisions — decisions that nobody else can make. For example, Juan Carlos of Spain personally ensured his country’s transition to a constitutional monarchy with parliamentary institutions and stood down an attempted military coup. At the end of the Second World War, the Japanese Emperor Hirohito defied his military’s wish to fight on and saved countless of his people’s lives by advocating for Japan’s surrender.
Fifth, monarchies are repositories of tradition and continuity in ever changing times. They remind a country of what it represents and where it came from, facts that can often be forgotten in the swiftly changing currents of politics.
Finally, rather counterintuitively, monarchies can serve up a head of state in a more democratic and diverse way than actual democratic politics. Since anyone, regardless of their personality or interests, can by accident of birth become a monarch, all types of people may become rulers in such a system. The head of state may thus promote causes or stir interest in issues and topics that would otherwise not be significant, as Prince Charles’ views on architecture prove. Politicians on the other hand, tend to have a certain personality — they are generally extroverted, can make or raise money, and have a tendency to pander or at least publicly hold to pre-defined mainstream views. The presence of a head of state with a psychological profile different from a politician can be refreshing.
Most of the criticisms of monarchy are no longer valid today, if they were ever valid. These criticisms are usually some variation of two ideas. Firstly, the monarch may wield absolute power arbitrarily without any sort of check, thus ruling as a tyrant. However, in present era, most monarchies rule within some sort of constitutional or traditional framework which constrains and institutionalizes their powers. Even prior to this, monarchs faced significant constraints from various groups including religious institutions, aristocracies, the wealthy, and even commoners. Customs, which always shape social interactions, also served to restrain. Even monarchies that were absolute in theory were almost always constrained in practice.
A second criticism is that even a good monarch may have an unworthy successor. However, today’s heirs are educated from birth for their future role and live in the full glare of the media their entire lives. This constrains bad behavior. More importantly, because they have literally been born to rule, they have constant, hands-on training on how to interact with people, politicians, and the media.
In light of the all the advantages of monarchy, it is clear why many citizens of democracies today have an understandable nostalgia for monarchy. As in previous centuries, monarchy will continue to show itself to be an important and beneficial political institution wherever it still survives
II. Why we should choose monarchy | Noah Wiener | TEDxYouth@ISPrague
III. Being and Living Under the Great Christian Culture: ‘Why did people help Cortez to bring down the Aztec Empire?’
by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar
Topic: Aztec Empire is not the victim as the left or woke media portrays them…
POV about the Spanish Empire: “The Spanish Imperial Monarchy is considered a saviour by mga tribo (tribes), kaharian (kingdoms) or mga sibilisasyon (civilisations) because many katutubo (natives) during that time especially in the case of Aztec Empire are against human sacrifices or the violence that these Aztec cults or gods incorporated in their worship & political management. Many tribes despised the Aztecs.
They see Spanish colonialism as a form of salvation and last resort to be free from the nonsense ritual of the priestly pagan class. This is the reason why many natives after the fall of Aztec Empire celebrated and converted to the Catholic fold. Other similar things also unfolded in other era of colonial or imperial expansion.
In Las Islas Filipinas (The Philippine Islands) many Alipin (slave) especially those called “saguigilid” (slave without rights) see these alliances not as a treason but a maneuver to boost their status.
Similar things also happened on the side of the Principalia (Principalities/Kingdoms) where the Rahas (Chiefs/Kings) & Datus (Lords/Princes) converted to the Catholic faith just to preserve their status, properties & well being of the people (those that are ruled) that they inherited from the Kerahaan (Royalty) and Maguinoo (Nobility) class that already existing prior to the era of the Kastila (Castillians). It’s all about politics after all.
It is good to note that because of the Judeo-Christian values that still influenced our society as of this day it created many competent & stable nation-states. That is a fact regardless of how imperfect or unpopular (because of Colonialism/imperialism) is the origin is.”
-words by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar, February 10, 2026
Photo: Human sacrifice as shown in the Codex Magliabechiano, Folio 70. Heart-extraction was viewed as a means of liberating the Istli and reuniting it with the Sun: the victim’s transformed heart flies Sun-ward on a trail of blood.
FACT:
1.) “Cortez only had 300 men when he conquered the Aztecs. The Aztecs were so hated by the other tribes that they provided Cortez almost 200,000 warriors to help him bring down the Aztecs”.
2.) “Some people are blabbing about how evil the Spanish Inquisition was compared to the nice nature-loving peaceful indigenous peoples of South America. So let’s just try to put this into perspective.
While exact numbers are difficult to determine due to incomplete records, historians estimate that fewer than 100 people were executed by the Spanish Inquisition in Mexico. This figure includes around 50 executions by the Mexican Inquisition, with 29 of those being “Judaizers” between 1571 and 1700, in other words people who secretly practiced Judaism.
Yes the Spanish acquisition was pretty unpleasant but the murder, torture, slaughter and wholesale genocides committed by the Aztecs were a whole order of magnitude greater than that, sometimes involving the extermination of entire tribes.
A dedication of a single temple in 1487, in the main city of the Aztec Empire, Tenochtitlan, is estimated to have involved as many as 80,400 human sacrifices, and most historians estimate that between 15,000 and 50,000 people were sacrificed by Aztec priests every year.
At the Great Skullrack in Tenochtitlan, Spanish chroniclers counted a minimum of 136,000 skulls, indicating the number of people sacrificed in the preceding few years.
The Aztec Empire, also known as the Triple Alliance, lasted for about 93 years, from its formation in 1428 to its fall in 1521. Thus, if we make the rather conservative estimate that they sacrificed “only” 10,750 people per year, that equates to a million people killed during their rule.
If we consider the number of people murdered for merely religious reasons as an index of the level of evil of a society, then an objective mathematical calculation tells us that the Aztec empire was 10,000 times more evil than the Spanish Empire, since the Aztecs murdered 10,000 times more innocent people in the name of their evil bloodthirsty religion.
The domination of the Spanish Empire lasted for about 400 years, so actually on average only about 0.25 people were killed by the inquisition every year, amounting to one person every four years…”
“Also you don’t need to be either Christian or Religious to appreciate the debt the world owes Christianity. It’s the keystone of Western Civilisation, the civilisation that created the modern world. Explained by Rafe Heydel-Mankoo. Interview with The Camila Tominey Show. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1FFSFuPVbo/
Even Christianity’s Biggest critic wants to live in a Christian Culture. (Richard Dawkins illustrates “cut flower syndrome”). Explained by Blake Bozarth. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1NHWFfeGJj/
I will never lower myself just to please the popular narrative. I had my own disposition in life. I will never compromise just to fit in or gain anyone’s approval. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BJJmYLfqk/
IV. ‘Pamana: An unpopular opinion regarding (most hardcore and not so hardcore) THE LEFT’s chaotic and unethical (no offense just my POV) economic model’ by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar
Other interesting reads: The Cambodia after Pol Pot. Read here: Facebook
Sept. 4, 2025
When the Monarchists speak about the popular narrative. The most unpopular but important stand that everyone must not forget is this…
According to historical records & historians, Socrates (Philosopher & Martyr) greatest fear is the tendency of democracy to be ruled by the mob (known today as Ultra/hardcore liberals, populists, anarchists or demagogues). He believes that not only rulers must be knowledgeable but also the voters. He believed that idiocy & people under it that avoided debates or simply those who avoid civil conversations (Socratic traditions) had no right to vote. Socrates believed that in order to understand something, one must ask questions in order to gather answers. And by doing that one can expose both the strongholds & loopholes of the ideas or subjects that are presented. Interestingly, Socrates is immortalized in Plato’s book, ‘The Republic’. And who is Plato? The one that gives us the ‘Theory of forms’ that later inspired us humans (ancient and modern) interest in understanding different forms of government (monarchy, republic & etc.). Both the two great thinkers are still influential up to this day because they inspired the western ideals (American & European) that still create impact.
Sept 5, 2025
PAMANA (Inheritance)
My opinion on generational wealth & revolution:
“I’m not against generational wealth as long as it comes from legal means and is built upon my ancestors’ hard work and good legacy. Regardless of the origin of the legacy, each era or civilization is bound by its local and international conventions. Parents, regardless of status, have always wanted their heirs to inherit what they cherish. We must respect this universal truth.
It’s understandable that people are angry with “nepo babies” of corrupt politicians, but will we apply the same judgment to other rich families and businesses that aren’t corrupt? Are we truly advocating for change or just acting on frustration? Some social media influencers seem to be creating a narrative that all political dynasties are corrupt or that generational wealth is something to be frowned upon. They’re advocating for a French-style revolution, but are they aware of the potential consequences?
These influencers might be inciting people to commit inhumane acts, which is a serious matter. Even historical figures like Robespierre ended up doing more harm than good. It seems like some individuals are using trends and public sentiment to advocate for something more extreme. Sometimes, it’s hard to tell if they’re genuinely against certain individuals or just using democracy to bully others online.
The idea of targeting alleged corrupt families can go overboard, especially when using platforms to promote unrealistic views inspired by Marx, Hegel, Mao, Lenin, and others. This narrative is prevalent on the left side of the political spectrum, which isn’t surprising given their ideologies. However, countries like Vietnam, China, and Russia have moved away from these hardcore ideals and adopted more capitalist approaches.
There’s nothing wrong with calling out corrupt families, but we must be vigilant about entities that might be using this issue to promote their own agendas. Ideas inspired by hardcore communism and socialism often lead to instability and harm. We can learn from history that mob rule and revolutions inspired by anarchism and hardcore communism often end in failure.
We should beware of demagogues and remember that the last two world wars were connected to extreme ideologies. Populism, anarchism, communism, and socialism might appeal to frustrated minds, but once emotions subside, they can unleash mad men turned mad dogs, creating a vacuum that leads to more horrors and corruption.
Philosophers like Plato and Socrates warned about the dangers of mob rule and the importance of balance in governance. We should be wary of revolutions and rebellions that claim to be on the side of freedom but might actually be promoting harmful ideals. Inequality and equality will always be part of human life, and trying to erase them completely can be a sign of idiocy.
Men are natural-born competitors, and the only thing we can do is create systems that benefit everyone, regardless of status or ideology. Let’s bridge the gap and avoid being part of another problem. Revolutions might look good on social media, but in reality, they can lead to true change or pave the way for the next tyrant. The economy is multifaceted, and both the upper and lower classes must work together.
Let’s not forget the importance of order above chaos and the natural desires of human nature. Classical ideals and philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Machiavelli and modern thinkers like Thomas Hobbes will always be relevant. Let’s focus on creating a better society by following our part of the bargain and working together.”
– POV by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar. Moderator of the Facebook group ‘Monarchists’. Originally written in Tagalog. Member of CoRRECT™ Movement Moderated Public Forum
2.) Related article: Why Monarchy is not expensive and self sufficient featuring “crown jewels are not stolen” by John M. Kelleher. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/172Efvv5CR/
5.) Interesting speech or philosophical arguments. See here: “We will not judge Him, I fear for when He will ask us the same.” -Words by Read Choi. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1K28JUcE1L/
7.) What can the Dutch Empire teach us about the importance of Capitalism in driving long-term success. Explained by Ray Dalio. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/17SjLqGpk4/
8.) They are not targeting wealth. They are targeting the systems that power the Philippine economy. Explained by Orion Perez Dumdum in PGMN Official. Here: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSHQjwWhs/
Another POV: “God’s view of inheritance: A generational blessing built on the aspirations and inspirations of predecessors to ensure the future of their successors. It is not just a simple handout. Inheritance is not just about finances; it is about heritage, continuity, security, and stability. God Himself promised and passed inheritance to His chosen people (the promised land) and creation. It is a philosophical truth where the universal right of an all-knowing Creator reflects the ideals of all humans who also want to pass their achievements to the next people of their bloodlines. So, inheritance represents God’s desire for His blessings to overflow and to be experienced by one generation to the next, but that right (or “privilege,” as the communists and socialists argued) comes with great responsibility. Not all inheritance is eternal. Some inherited it but squandered it accidentally, while others did it knowingly. God predestined that those in the upper class must dress, feed, or help those in need. God Himself equates these actions as man’s direct way of showing love towards Him as their God. This is the reason why tithes are given as a law to the Israelites, and even Christians who are mostly not Jews are free to practice it as long as the giving comes freely from the heart. In return, the people who are being helped must be grateful and not covet things that do not belong to them… unless they know that these properties are indeed stolen or belong to them in the first place. Covetousness and demagoguery (the appeal of using popular narrative or sentiments to justify indefensible ideas) are also forms of corruption. Do not try to sugarcoat or sell it; it will not survive in the long run.”
Effects of revolution powered by idiocy, mob rule & anarchism? Well, the government will have to spend billions in rebuilding public properties. Foreign investors will find a hard time in trusting again the “stability” of that nation state (Example: Nepal) I know that in corruption everyone finds it difficult to go by BUT STILL in a stable although not perfect economy and politics everyone can still live and thrive.
Remember in every chaos there will be evil people or organisations (hardcore liberals or simply “leftists” or reds aka communists/Socialists) that will always hijacked revolutions built on Demagoguery or wokeism gone overboard… And to our fellow Monarchists that resided in Nepal, don’t let the atheists/communists/socialists/anarchists or demagogues hijacked ur divine aspirations & inspirations. Call them out. Who knows another faction from the left (same atheists/communists/socialists/anarchists) will arise. Remember even the communist regime of PM Oli had its own power struggles from within & it might be possible that a foreign nation is behind this. Be careful. Remind the younger generation to stop the madness. Context read here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16KVaPEKLw/
Sept 11, 2025 “I had liberal friends but I don’t wholeheartedly trust them. Most of them (in my observation) are admirers of anarchists, arsonists, demagogues, populists or MOB RULE. Not to mention that they admired atheism & abortion. Ideologies that remove (most of the time) the divinity (and dignity) of human existence. Conservatives and traditionalism are not perfect BUT STILL the Trad (Traditionalism) & Con (Conservatism) are still the guardian of humanity’s different civilisations. ” -Shemuel
20.) Relevance: Why Monarchism is so important still in making the nation state (Statecraft)? Full explanations and references here. Featuring the Middle east, Nepal & Iran: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CaBcyJtxk/
23.) The Monarchists’ relevance as guardians of unity, continuity and stability. A.) Featuring & ‘The art of strategic ambiguity. Explained by Sass Rogando Sasot’ & ‘Think Monarchies are bad? Think again by Akhilesh Pillalamarri of The Diplomat’. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19b52jL48u/
About the writer of the POV:
Shemuel Gallardo Vivar , Filipino constitutional monarchist & conservative (moderate conservatism). Shem is a Humss12Grad, LGBTQIA+ member, CulinaryGrad, Pre-Colonial advocate & admirer of Animist-Hinduist-Buddhist arts, philosophy & etc. A Descendant of The Vivar Clan of Kamaligan (Camalig) & Pinag Gubatan (Guinubatan), Albay of Las Islas Filipinas.
Shem is serving (since 2022) at the royal court of His Royal Majesty Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram , De Jure 35th monarch of The Royal House of Sulu (Raha Muda or Crown Prince during Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974 Sulu coronation. Son of the late 34th monarch. One of the legal heirs or present day descendants (1 of the inheritors of Sabah Private Lease agreement) by the power of McCaskie Court Decision Year 1939…)
____________________ A.) What is Noblesse Oblige? Noblesse oblige is the idea that people with high social status, wealth, or privilege have a moral obligation to act generously, responsibly, and with honor towards others, particularly those less fortunate. It translates from French as “nobility obligates,” implying that privilege entails responsibility. An example is a wealthy philanthropist who uses their fortune to fund community projects and improve society, not just for profit or personal gain, but out of a sense of duty. Key aspects of noblesse oblige: 1.) Moral obligation : It’s not a legal requirement but a sense of duty to give back or help others.
2.) Position matters : The concept applies to those in positions of power, influence, or high birth, whether inherited or earned.
3.) Generosity and responsibility : The obligation involves being kind, honorable, and acting in a way that is consistent with one’s privileged position. Example: Imagine a successful entrepreneur who has built a large company and accumulated significant wealth. According to the principle of noblesse oblige, this entrepreneur would feel a responsibility to use their resources to benefit society.
4.) This could manifest as: Donating to charities that support causes they care about.
5.) Funding community initiatives like schools or public parks.
6.) Advocating for policies that addresses social inequality. Mentoring and supporting individuals from less privileged backgrounds to help them advance.
7.) Noblesse Oblige applies to royals, nobility (aristocracy), social media influencers, leaders & etc.
B.) A Monarchists History: Topic: How does personal hatred affect our view in history? Featuring: How the British empire stopped slavery.. Context: ‘On August 1, 1834, Britain passed the Slavery Abolition Act, outlawing the owning, buying, and selling of humans as property throughout its colonies around the world. While this did not free enslaved people in the United States, it was a source of inspiration and hope for abolitionists.” -Google
POV: “Slavery was humanity’s sin, not the monopoly of one race — and it ended because people chose conviction over comfort. That’s the part the woke script leaves out. Real strength isn’t found in clinging to victimhood but in rejecting it, owning history honestly, and building forward. Those who refuse the victim role radiate the kind of emotional strength that can’t be faked — and that’s why they stand out.”
1.) HRM Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram , De Jure 35th monarch of The Royal House of Sulu . Raha Muda (Crown Prince) during Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974 Sulu coronation. Son of the late 34th monarch. One of the legal heirs or present day descendants (1 of the inheritors of Sabah Private Lease agreement) by the power of McCaskie Court Decision Year 1939.
2.) HRH Datu (Prince) Nizamuddin Kiram , Maharadjah adinda 2nd heir apparent to the Sulu Throne.
3.) Shemuel Gallardo Vivar , Filipino monarchist, aristocrat & conservative (moderate conservatism). Admin of the Facebook page, Pilipinas: Mga Katutubong “Dugong Bughaw”. . Shem is currently serving at the royal court of Sulu. CulinaryGrad, Humss12grad, Pre-Colonial Advocate, LGBTQIA member & admirer of Animist-Hinduist-Buddhist arts history philosophy heritage & etc. A descendant of The Vivar Clan of Kamaligan (Camalig) & Pinag Gubatan (Guinubatan), Albay of Las Islas Filipinas. A line of Catholic Maguinoo (Nobility).
PART 3: Asia’s Monarchies: Inside The World’s Last Remaining Kingdoms | Full Series | Real Royalty
Part 4: Social Media PINNED POST (IN FACEBOOK, TWITTER, TIKTOK AND QUORA) Version (Copy). A COMPLETE OVERVIEW. See the following (links below) updates regarding our institution…
I will never lower myself just to please the popular narrative. I had my own disposition in life. I will never compromise just to fit in or gain anyone’s approval. #philippines#pilipinas#sulu#monarchy#monarchysupporter
or check our compiled updates at sgv.ecseachamber.org See the following updates below regarding our institution…
Shem is one of the Official Social Media Admin (OSMA) of HRM Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram , De Jure 35th monarch of The Royal House of Sulu . Sultan Muedzul is the Raha Muda (Crown Prince) of Mohammed Mahakuttah Abdullah Kiram (reigned 1974–1986) the last titular Sultan of Sulu officially recognized by the government of the Philippines during Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974 Sulu coronation. Sultan Muedzul is the successor of the 34th monarch and also one of the legal heirs or present day descendants (1 of the inheritors of Sabah Private Lease agreement) as confirmed or in accordance to the McCaskie Court Decision Year 1939.
Part 4: One of the ( legitimate 35th Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram’s) interviews in The Philippines National television that aired many years ago. Reported by the late Mike Enriquez of Saksi (Witness by GMA-7 Channel) & Kara David. Watch here: https://youtu.be/gYaq6KsqwZc?si=vbTyDC5SSTxpvEoy
Part 5: The Sultan of Sulu’s Official interview. A special episode by Bishop Joseph Lagumbay a Liberal independent catholic (YouTube Full uncut interview). Explains Sultanate, Recognition, Sabah claims, Sabah Private arbitral award & other issues. Including his respect towards the members of LGBTQIA+ Community. An interview set by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar : https://youtu.be/foPMce–egk?si=Mx0jjUfVFXqOrMUS
Part 7: Official Statement of The De Jure 35th Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram of The Sulu archipelago regarding fake claimants, fake royals & fake titles of Royalty or nobility. Published by Sir Orion Perez D of The CoRRECT™ Movement Moderated Public Forum. Read here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1XsW592Su4/
Part 8: The Philippine Consulate General in Jeddah informs the public that AL -HARAMAIN TRAVEL & TOURS INC is not authorized by the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to process visas for gratis hajj pilgrims in the Philippines. The Consulate statement is attached: https://www.facebook.com/share/1YL6WH6QPM/
Part 9 The overall info about the historicity of Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974 & the last Philippine government recognized monarch (34th Sultan Mohammad Mahakuttah Abdulla Kiram of Sulu who reigned from 1974 to 1986 ) & his son the Raha Muda (Crown Prince & late 35th De jure monarch) Read here: https://sultanateofsulu.ecseachamber.org/the…/index-1.htm
Part 10 Advisory of The Royal House of Sulu against “Datu Mudarusalail A. Kiram” the usurper or false 35th sultan. Official Date May 4, 2024. Read here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EmT9BTm66/
Part 11 For those that are stubborn. A friendly but frank reminder. Featuring the issue regarding Fake news from Malaysian critics about the Foshan trip, Universal acknowledged human rights to lease, Act. 2722 of May 16, 1917 & revocation of Sabah transfer to Ph (Moot & Academic). Challenging the popular narrative regarding the nature of transfer that is endorsed by False Sultans: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1DBUr2nq42/
Part 12 check our organisation here. Rediscover our institution’s heritage, history or traditions. Read more: sultanateofsulu.org
Part 16 Aug 1, 2025: Why Monarchies still matter in 2025: Inside the Billion Dollar Royal Families | Statecraft Ep. 168. Explained by India Today Global: https://youtu.be/_YuryH7UJRA?si=nQZnl8P6UoaIQXNL
Part 17 Why Monarchies Are Still Relevant and Useful in the 21st Century. Think monarchies are bad? Think again. By Akhilesh PillalamarriWhy Monarchies Are Still Relevant and Useful in the 21st Century – Explained by The Diplomat https://thediplomat.com/…/why-monarchies-are-still…/
Part 20 The Kiram, Sulu & Sabah: History of Sultanate that predates The Philippines & Bangsamoro construct of Mindanao, Reintegration to Zamboanga & North Borneo’s Revocation of Transfer (Moot & Academic). A complete historical overview or summary: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1JQ4quZ4UM/
Part 23 Educational videos about world history & statecraft from various individuals (from men of academe, organisations, social media influencers & etc.) Let’s advocate for the sharing of wisdom because knowledge is power. Here: sgv.ecseachamber.org
See also copy in Quora: /profile/Shemuel-Gallardo-Vivar/Topic-A-reflection-Things-that-can-truly-happen-if-The-Philippines-is-uncolonized-Reflection-LAHAT-I-mean-Halos https://www.quora.com/…/Topic-A-reflection-Things-that…
– Point of view (POV) by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar , Filipino constitutional monarchist (Monarchist), Aristocrat, LGBTQIA+ member & moderate conservative (conservatism). Social media admin of the Facebook page ‘Pilipinas: Mga Katutubong “Dugong Bughaw” & Facebook group ‘Pre-Colonial Philippines Group (PreCoPhiGr). Also a moderator of the Facebook group ‘ Monarchists ‘. Currently serving at The Royal Court of Sulu (under De jure 35th monarch Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram . Raha Muda or crown prince during Presidential Order Memorandum Order 427 year 1974 Sulu coronation. Son of the last government recognized 34th Tausug monarch Sultan Mahakuttah Abdulla Kiram who reigned from 1974 to 1986. One of the inheritors of the Sabah Private Lease Agreement. One of the legal heirs or present day descendants of the official 9 principal heirs mentioned in the McCaskie court decision year 1939.
) & it’s legitimate heirs.
________________________
A.) Monarchism’s Enduring Legacy
by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar (Part2)
_________________
In the realms of politics, where elected ones run amok,
A steadfast weight holds, a sovereign decree.
Divine ideals, a guiding star,
Shaping history, a heritage so light.
Constitutional monarchs, a symbol of unity,
Absolute crowns, a legacy of stability.
Through global tides, they stand as one & wide,
A bulwark against the waves of change, began.
In times of upheaval, they provide a connective bridge,
A unifying force, across the crownlands.
Their heritage, a treasure to foretold,
A continuity of tradition, forever to uphold.
Why destroy palaces that have stood the test?
Why tear down castles that built a nation’s best?
Monarchies, a symbol of national pride,
A connection to the ancient, where elegance are firstly & truest reside.
In a world of flux, they offer a steady gaze,
A reassuring presence, through life’s maze.
Their relevance, a beacon in darkness,
Guiding nations, through the blight caused by the degenerated rebellious reds.
So let us cherish, these monarchies of old,
A legacy of greatness, forever to be retold.
For in their continuity, we find our strength,
A unity of God’s purpose, a nation’s enduring majesty.
———————————-
– ‘Monarchism’s enduring legacy’ by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar
B.) Bottom Line: Character & performance oriented: Fact: ” One thing is for sure the current dynasty can set rules for the next generation to follow. The difference in Monarchy & Republic is the allegiance. The monarchy adheres to the core of the country(History Heritage Principles etc). While the second(Rep.) are more partisan and unpredictable (continuity & stability) .”
Additional explaining or STUDIES: Economies & prominent Political (Absolute) & Neutral (Constitutional) Dynasties (Monarchist) context:
1.) The True cost of the royal family. Explained by CGP GREY. A long standing treaty of the British Parliament with the Georgians uo to the Windsors Watch here: https://youtu.be/bhyYgnhhKFw?si=qivKlPA6ve-6bR-y
2.) King of Thailand: The richest king in the world? Explained by Jack from Thailand. A treaty with the Chakri Dynasty & how they use their private properties to support the people using Tradition & Investors. Watch here: https://youtu.be/ZnujtykWdgc?si=CJylLeodXHQVx4cd
8.) The wealthy elite that owns the world. Explained by Infographics. And the circumstances why they should own it for the sake of their people: https://youtu.be/eJcXagrK36s?si=leohwqAQ4nrxTuHI
11.) Understanding the Pre-destined responsibility of Monarchist (Royal/Noble) Families & addressing the issue of Divine right. By Monarchist Party USA: https://www.facebook.com/share/173ZWRVQtk/
12.) More about us? Study more or read articles or see past interviews about us and our advocacy (Monarchism) for constitutional monarchism & the preservation of Pre-Colonial history & heritage (Islam, Hinduism & Buddhism) . Links also include past posts about the nature of the Sabah Private Arbitration award. All posts had interconnected references (links) that explained things in full detail. Published Jan 12, 2023: https://www.facebook.com/share/1CAuHZE1LZ/
15.) The official statement of the admins of PreCoPhiGr (Pre-Colonial Philippines Group) concerning those who criticized our advocacy (Preservation of Pre-Colonial history, heritage or identity): https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B2b2U5mHu/
37.) “Capitalism is unfair BUT it’s flexible. You can build. Pivot. And survive. And sometimes…survival is the only justice left. All systems can be corrupted. The real question is this: ‘Which one gives you a fighting chance even when it’s broken? You will say Communism is good & Socialism is peace? Sounds good…until you experience it..” – TikTok: Huss Sbeiti Here: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSAgLffVD/
___________________________
AI Overview:
1.) Why Socrates hated Democracy :
Socrates viewed Athenian democracy as a system that granted too much power to the uneducated populace, making it vulnerable to manipulation by demagogues and leading to poor decisions. He argued that voting is a skill requiring wisdom and knowledge, comparable to operating a ship, and that electing leaders should be the domain of specialists rather than the unlearned. Socrates was pessimistic about rule by the crowd, fearing that it would lead to societal “shipwreck” through ill-informed choices and a corruption of the common good.
Socrates’s Core Arguments Against Democracy
Voting is a skill, not a right:
Socrates believed that participating in government requires specific knowledge and expertise, much like being a skilled sailor or a captain. He argued that simply allowing everyone to vote, regardless of their understanding of complex political issues, was irresponsible.
The tyranny of the majority:
He worried that a system based on majority rule could lead to the masses making foolish decisions based on emotion or superficial appeal, rather than on rational judgment or informed understanding of the issues.
Vulnerability to demagoguery:
Socrates was deeply concerned that democracy provided an opening for “demagogues”—political leaders who use charisma, prejudices, and false promises to gain power by manipulating voters.
Rule by the uneducated crowd:
He felt that governing should be the work of specialists who possess the necessary wisdom and knowledge to interpret complex issues and make sound decisions for the state.
The Ship Analogy
A central analogy used by Socrates, and famously detailed by his student Plato, likens society to a ship at sea. He questioned who should be in charge: a skilled and trained captain or a random passenger chosen by vote? For Socrates, democracy was like letting untrained, uneducated individuals navigate a vessel through a storm; it was bound to lead to disaster.
Historical Context
Socrates was critical of the Athenian democracy of his time, and his openly antidemocratic views contributed to the suspicion that led to his conviction and execution by a democratic process.
2.) Plato proposed the forms of government to illustrate how justice in the state reflects justice in the individual soul, arguing that a just society, like a just soul, is one where reason rules. In his book The Republic, he identified five forms: aristocracy, which he considered ideal; timocracy, rule by the honorable; oligarchy, rule by the rich; democracy, rule by the people; and tyranny, rule by a single despot. Plato advocated for aristocracy, led by wise philosopher-kings, as the best form because it ensures that reason, rather than desire or wealth, governs the city.
Why Plato proposed the forms of government?
To define the just state:
Plato’s primary goal was to understand what constitutes a just city and, by extension, a just individual. By examining the different forms of government and their decay, he sought to define the perfect political state.
To show the relationship between individual and state:
He believed that the structure of the state mirrored the structure of the human soul. The ideal state, with its ruler possessing reason, corresponds to the rational part of the individual.
To critique contemporary governments:
Plato, through the character of Socrates, critiqued existing forms of government like democracy. He saw democracy as flawed because it was susceptible to the whims of the masses and could lead to instability and the elevation of persuasion over truth.
The five forms of government and their critique:
Aristocracy (Ideal):
Rule by the best and most virtuous, specifically philosopher-kings who are guided by reason and wisdom.
Timocracy:
A government where honor and military valor are the primary values, eventually leading to a preoccupation with wealth.
Oligarchy:
Rule by the rich, where wealth becomes the sole qualification for power and can lead to social and economic inequality.
Democracy:
Rule by the people, which Plato viewed critically for its potential to descend into chaos and mob rule, prioritizing individual freedom to an excessive degree.
Tyranny:
The worst form of government, resulting from the degeneration of democracy, where a single ruler exercises absolute power.
3.) Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan (published in 1651) in response to the political instability and fear of the English Civil War (1642-1651) to advocate for an absolute sovereign to impose order and prevent a “state of nature” where life would be “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short”. He argued that individuals should enter a “social contract” to create a powerful, centralized government, the “Leviathan,” in exchange for peace and security.
Context: The English Civil War
Hobbes witnessed the political and religious violence of the English Civil War, which led to the beheading of King Charles I and widespread fear.
This period was characterized by uncertainty and conflict, with competing interests between Parliamentarians and Royalists vying for power.
The State of Nature
Hobbes believed that without a strong government, humans would exist in a “state of nature” where they are equal but driven by self-interest.
In this state, life would be a perpetual state of war, defined by “”continued fear and danger of violent death,” leaving no room for industry, agriculture, or society.
The Social Contract
To escape the “war of all against all,” Hobbes proposed a social contract in which people voluntarily surrender their individual freedoms and power to an absolute sovereign.
This sovereign, the “Leviathan,” would then have total authority to enforce laws and ensure peace, preventing the descent into chaos.
The “Leviathan” as Government
The “Leviathan” is a metaphor for a powerful, unified, and absolute government that acts as the head and body of the commonwealth.
This powerful state was necessary to maintain order and provide security, which Hobbes believed was essential for human well-being and the avoidance of societal collapse.
4.) Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 as both a pragmatic job application to gain favor and employment with the new Medici rulers of Florence, and to provide a realistic guide for rulers, like Giuliano de’ Medici, to achieve and maintain political stability and power, especially in a fragmented and conflict-ridden Italy. He sought to offer guidance based on the “effectual truth” of how politics was actually practiced, rather than on idealized notions of how rulers should act, using his own diplomatic and political experiences as a source of practical advice.
Motivations for writing The Prince?
A Job Application:
After the Medici returned to power in Florence in 1512, Machiavelli, a former diplomat, found himself sidelined and exiled. He wrote The Prince as a way to demonstrate his political usefulness and regain a public service position.
A Handbook for Rulers:
: Machiavelli intended The Prince to be a practical guide for governing, a departure from earlier works in the “mirror for princes” tradition that focused on ideal rulers and virtues. He aimed to provide a “handbook for rulers” focused on maintaining power in the real world, not in a perfect or imaginary state.
Political Stability for Italy:
Italy was a collection of independent, often warring states, and was subject to foreign influence. Machiavelli believed that a strong, united Italy was necessary and suggested that the ruler who followed the principles in The Prince could bring stability and repel foreign powers.
Political Realism:
: Machiavelli’s experiences as a diplomat gave him firsthand knowledge of political maneuvering and the chaos of his time. He wanted to write about the “effectual truth” of politics—how power was actually gained and kept—even if it meant employing immoral acts.
Context and Influences:
The “Mirror for Princes” Genre. The Prince is part of a long tradition of educational texts that offer advice to rulers.
Political Chaos in Italy:
Machiavelli’s work was a product of the intense political conflicts and foreign invasions that plagued Italy in his lifetime.
Real-World Experience:
His extensive experience in Florentine politics and diplomacy informed his pragmatic approach to statecraft and his focus on effective leadership.
____________
Want some good reads about history ? Check (Here’s the example) our post here:
It has come to our attention that there are some fake profiles, groups or pages impersonating us (or dummy accounts) by having a similar name, picture & claiming that they’re connected in our institution and advocacy.
Please be advised that we do not have any personal profiles under our name aside from the official social media accounts, groups & pages of ours (all which I personally managed) that I already mentioned earlier (Links) . Any other accounts claiming to be me (or us) is fraudulent and should be reported immediately.
I/We kindly urge you all to:
• Report the fake profiles, accounts, pages or groups
• Decline messages or friend requests from them
• Do not engage with or respond to any messages from the impersonators or dummy accounts.
• know that Royal House of Sulu, Pre-Colonial Philippines Group (PreCoPhiGr) & Pilipinas: Mga Katutubong “Dugong Bughaw” only entertain or give blessings to those we know personally.
Any projects that will be done with these fake accounts that will be featured in social media or by any means are not connected to the Filipino constitutional monarchists that supports Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram. All deals from these fake individuals or institutions are not connected by any means to us and is not sanction by the Sultanate of Sulu & North Borneo. By the grace of God & by the divine legitimacy of His Royal Majesty, this is not only an advice or simply a request. The institution demands it to avoid further more confusion.
Thank you for your continued love and support- and for helping us to maintain a safe and respectful online space in our various social media platforms.
What are the other ways to create a healthy social media space? Typically, I don’t reply. And if they persist I just block them. I’m not perfect I also did things that in the end I resent that I did. My past is not just colourful but also dull.
Sometimes declining to prove ur point, innocence or personal views & maintaining one’s silence and keeping on doing ur thing is the best way to go on. There are more relevant & legitimate institutions where I’m obliged to talk to.
Always remember that irrelevant people will only be relevant once we entertain them. Just don’t reply or just simply block them. And if they comment and try to mislead or police the narrative by spreading falsehoods (in the comment section) just delete their comments or better turn off the comment section & EDIT thy post. When you edit ur post, address all of them equally. By doing this you can prove ur point with the avoidance of time consuming & good for nothing or simply “idiotic” conversations.
After all it’s ur posts & ur own account. Critics, posers or bashers are just like the mythical Vampires of old lore. They can only enter your house (or life) once you invite them or let them go through the door.
_________________
This facebook post is pinned (May 27, 2025) Here for easy access: More updates regarding the current 35th Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram & his heirs & legitimate successors (to follow). To be always updated starting from the year 2025 & onwards. To be continued…
Updates:
1.) “Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram’s royal products (with Royal Arms/ Royal Warrant of Appointment), honours bestowed by Presidents (Including Barack Obama himself), reigning Monarchs and many Heads of Sovereign States to many more recognitions to come. Plus future documentaries starting year 2026. Hosted by Ruben Terlou. A doctor, film maker & award winning journalist is beloved by many in Holland as well as Belgium, France & Germany .” Kevin C. Limjoco
About the Source: H.H Datu Kevin Randolph Carrion Limjoco ( Kevin C. Limjoco ) , Chancellor of the Royal House of the Pearl, Minister of Commercial and Cultural Affairs. The Amir Bahar of Sulu, RCPS. He is also a Movie actor, Monarchist & Producer. One of the great and long time members of the 35th Sulu Sultan’s royal court. Published June 4, 2025
2.) Matthew Pajares Yngson , Rajah of Tambulian. Diplomat, Author, Journalist, Businessperson, Humanitarian & Modern monarchist. Contact here: https://www.facebook.com/share/1FaTohifaR/
3.) HRM 35th Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram and his Queen-Consort Mellany S. Kiram, paid a courtesy visit to Kuta Heneral & Major General of the Join Task Force Orion, 11th ID Phil Army. Here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16TxWjzzJ9/
More about myself as the social media admin, LGBTQIA+ member, History-Heritage advocate, moderate conservative (conservatism), Humss12 grad/Culinary grad, Buddhist & Filipino constitutional monarchist Shemuel Gallardo Vivar :
A.) “The Vivar lineage (or Clan) of Camalig & Guinubatan of The Legazpi in Albay & other notable Vivar (Maniquis & Legazpi) that entered The Philippines & The Royal House of Sulu…” (Sultanate) . Here:
Note: Vivar is from Catalogo Alfabetico de Apellidos & the origin of Vivar, Not related to El Cid but still from the line of Kinadatuan/Maguinoo of Camalig & Guinubatan bearing the family name “Vivar”.
F.) My position in the ‘Political spectrum is “Centre Right”. Center for moderate, balanced & pragmatic. And Right for conservative, traditional & often ideologically driven approaches.
H.) Why we don’t support Communism & Socialism ? We the admins or Filipino constitutional monarchists wanted to protect the free market capitalism ideals and other practical but still realistic or beneficial proposals for the next generation to come. Read the full context here: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19bM4DeVCY/
Part 7: The Vivar Clan of Kamaligan (Camalig) & Pinag Gubatan, Albay Philippines. A bunch of ancestral stories & histories behind a Coat of Arms: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16hYHzSbRs/
___________________________________
“The great combination of governance is History, Heritage, Meritocracy, Nobility, Monarchy & Unity. Times truly change but duty will always ( & must be) endure.”
Part 6 “True intellectual Freedom is not about absolutism or the absolute control of the narrative. It’s about balancing the intellectual discourse.” Explained by CJ Hiro: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19NsDFgRd1/
Part 16 Why despite the popularity of the left (communist-socialist) I still chose to be a moderate conservative & support monarchism by serving The Royal House of Sulu (Kiram Dynasty under Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram)? Bottom line: An image of Unity, Continuity, Stability & Natural balance under a human dynastic form that is bounded by realistic conventions. Imperfect still?
Notable works arguing in favor of monarchy include
Abbott, Tony (1995). The Minimal Monarchy: And Why It Still Makes Sense For Australia
Alighieri, Dante (c. 1312). De Monarchia
Aquinas, Thomas (1267). De Regno, to the King of Cyprus
Auslin, Michael (2014). America Needs a King
Balmes, Jaime (1850). European Civilization: Protestantism and Catholicity Compared in their Effects on the Civilization of Europe[note 1]
Bellarmine, Robert (1588). De Romano Pontifice, On the Roman Pontiff
Bodin, Jean (1576). The Six Books of the Republic
Bogdanor, Vernon (1997). The Monarchy and the Constitution
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne (1709). Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture
Charles I of England (1649). Eikon Basilike
Coulombe, Charles A. (2016). Star-Spangled Crown: A Simple Guide to the American Monarchy
Chateaubriand, François-René de (1814). Of Buonaparte, and the Bourbons, and of the Necessity of Rallying Round Our Legitimate Princes
Cram, Ralph Adams (1936). Invitation to Monarchy
Filmer, Robert (1680). Patriarcha
Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan
Hermann-Hoppe, Hans (2001). Democracy: The God That Failed
— (2014). From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy: A Tale of Moral and Economic Folly and Decay
James VI and I (1598). The True Law of Free Monarchies
— (1599). Basilikon Doron
Jean, Count of Paris (2009). Un Prince Français
Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Erik von (1952). Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Times
— (2000). Monarchy and War
Maistre, Joseph de (1797). Considerations on France
Pius VI (1793). Pourquoi Notre Voix
Scruton, Roger (1991). A Focus of Loyalty Higher Than the State
Ségur, Louis Gaston Adrien de (1871). Vive le Roi!
Vegas Latapiè, Eugenio (1983). Memorias politicas. El suicidio de la monarquia y la Segunda Republica
Whittle, Peter (2011). Monarchy Matters
_________________________
__________________
June 19, 2025:
1. For more interesting facts about human life, history, culture & etc. Check our official Facebook groups/pages (Like, share & follow) in Facebook. See below. Want to interview His Royal Majesty? Don’t worry just contact us. See below:
2. This post (and all of my past & future posts) are always updated and interconnected by many links or references (for easy access regarding various topics). This is done for the sake of history & education. Same rules also apply in my
Last words: “Last advice to everyone? I’m not surprised if you will resort to Ad Hominem. That feels when there’s nothing left to argue. That feels when a critic will simply resort to personal attacks just because he or she is experiencing intellectual bankruptcy. The worst case scenario?
A Filipino modern culture that is hellbent in cancelling good arguments just because they can’t accept the fact. Well, sorry to burst your bubble…Monarchism (especially constitutional ones) endured many upheavals. The same also applies to conservatives just like us who transformed themselves in a moderate form (moderate conservatism).
But the question is, will your ideas or principles last or will you be able to pass such a close-minded way of thinking to the next generation?
You don’t want dictators, but when fed with truth, you try to bury it in lies and anger? Is your view of others or yourself that low? What do you really want? Medicine from truth or medicine from lies?
As always, history is not for you alone to love or hate. It belongs to all of us. History doesn’t care about feelings or popular opinion regardless of how the majority of the people see it. Take the full context of histories as it is. Take it as it is.
If it makes you fall in love (to history) then much better because at least you appreciate it truly for what it is BUT if not? Then also good. At least you will not repeat the same mistakes or outcome of the past (and yes, all the things about monarchism, economies, histories & things about the Kiram & Sabah revocation of transfer & it’s private nature are legitimate or factual arguments. Take it or leave it. You decide). Accept it unconditionally.”
-Shemuel Gallardo Vivar
Humss12Grad, CulinaryGrad, Filipino constitutional monarchist, Moderate conservative, LGBTQIA+ member, Pre-Colonial Advocate. Born christian but still admired the Animist-Hinduist-Buddhist arts, history, philosophy & etc. Shem has been serving at the royal court of (Kiram Dynasty) Sulu since year 2021 under the authority of De jure 35th Sultan Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram (Raha Muda or crown prince during Presidential Order Memorandum 427 year 1974).
___________________
An example of known individuals that are still fighting history haters that promotes idiocracy & demagoguery…
Reference (Looking back at history) :
A.) Descendant of St. King Louis to americas:
“Defend the statue (against woke/Liberals/atheist/socialist/communist/anarchist. Same people that criticize religious and other conservative institutions, creeds or organisations that they see as evil or unnecessary BUT are also the first ones who became extremist & delusional in their ways of advocating) with honour, faith & courage (because it is the symbol of both european & non european civilisations that benefit or protected by western democratic ideals)”.
Solzhenitsyn Mourned Bastille Day. So Should All Christians. ( including the proponents of traditionalism & conservatism especially those who adhere to Moderatism)
Most of the horrors of the modern world, including the current ‘woke’ insanity, can be traced directly back to Bastille Day and the French Revolution. The French Revolution invented radical nationalism and socialism, and launched the first modern genocide, aimed at Christians (& other faiths or natural Institutions) -By John Zimirak. Read: https://musingsofanoldcurmudgeon.blogspot.com/…/solzhen…
Part 3 Sept 3, 2025 : A black man defended the United Kingdom’s biggest contribution—the end of slavery. Topic: How does our personal hatred affect our view in history? Featuring: How the British empire stopped slavery.. Context: ‘On August 1, 1834, Britain passed the Slavery Abolition Act, outlawing the owning, buying, and selling of humans as property throughout its colonies around the world. While this did not free enslaved people in the United States, it was a source of inspiration and hope for abolitionists.” -Google
POV: “Slavery was humanity’s sin, not the monopoly of one race — and it ended because people chose conviction over comfort. That’s the part the woke script leaves out. Real strength isn’t found in clinging to victimhood but in rejecting it, owning history honestly, and building forward. Those who refuse the victim role radiate the kind of emotional strength that can’t be faked — and that’s why they stand out.”
“Preserving history & heritage is everyone’s duty regardless of personal political leanings. History and heritage is not there to tear us all apart. It is there to keep us united, stable & make our society continuous. The future will not be a future without the past”.
-Words by Shemuel Gallardo Vivar,
A descendant of The Vivar Clan of Kamaligan (Camalig) & Pinag Gubatan (Guinubatan), Albay of Las Islas Filipinas (A line of Catholic Maguinoo (Nobility). A Filipino constitutional monarchist & aristocrat, moderate conservative, LGBTQIA+ member, Humss12grad, CulinaryGrad, Pre-Colonial advocate & admirer of Animist-Hinduist-Buddhist arts, history, philosophy, heritage & etc. Currently serving at The Royal House of Sulu.
“Monarchism as an ideology and form or way of thinking, living or governance had its own Pros and Cons (just like any other ideology)…but always choose the most practical that most of the time will result in unity, continuity, stability and non partisanship. A form of government inspired by both the divine and human inspirations and aspirations. A “hereditary principle” that is inspired by the universal truths that encompass all faith, languages, race, tribes and borders. Monarchy and being a true monarchist (Constitutional and Absolutist depends on you) is the only sole option a country can have. You still have time to elect or crown a hereditary head of state.”
PART 5: The ROYAL AND HASHEMITE ORDER OF THE PEARL.
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl is the dynastic order of the Royal House of Sulu. It is the the premier body and grandest honour of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo. The order is an honourable and nobiliary entity that has been instituted as a dynastic Order of Datuship equivalent to the traditional dynastic orders of chivalry. The order continues the traditional customs and magnificence of the Royal Sultanate of Sulu and the Sultan’s Royal Court. His Royal Majesty Ampun Sultan Hadji Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram, as Head of the Royal House of Sulu, is the hereditary sovereign who possesses the fons honorum and is the Grand Sayyid (Grand Master) of the order.
The Order respects all religions and ethnicities. It focuses on charitable and non-political activities except where the sovereign rights and prerogatives of His Royal Majesty and the Royal Sultanate of Sulu are concerned.
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl of Sulu was formally established by a Royal Decree in 2011, by the Sultan, exercising his de jure sovereign right as a fons honorum (font of honor) to institute it. It is, however, a Royal Order whose roots run very deep. When the current Sultan of Sulu, at the time Raja Muda the Crown Prince decided to establish an Order of Companions to meet today’s national and international expectations, he sought to unite different elements of the royal, nobiliary and chivalrous traditions of the Sultanate in its values, constitution and design. The Sultan is the Grand Sayyid of the order, and his heirs and successors, as subsequent Heads of the Royal House of Sulu, will be the hereditary Grand Sayyids of the Order.
Symbolism
Almost from the beginning of human civilization, the pearl has represented something very precious, but at the same time something sophisticated and rare. The symbolism of the pearl is very significant. It is mentioned in many ancient writings and the sacred books of many great world religions, including Islam, Christianity and Hinduism. For centuries, pearl harvesting was vital to the economy of the Sultanate. Only the Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo had the right to possess the largest and most valuable pearls found in the archipelago.
The term “Hashemite” in the title of the Order has its roots in the very foundations of the Kiram dynasty. The term refers to the ancient Arab clan Hashemites, descendants of Hashim. Hashemites are descendants of the Prophet Muhammad through his daughter Fatima and her husband Ali. Descendants of Fatima and Ali carry the honorary titles Sayyid (master) and the Sharif (noble).
On the insignia of the Order (collar, badges, stars, rosettes, and miniatures) are elements of the Coat of Arms of the Sultanate of Sulu: double saber, pearl, crescent, star, and crown. Besides the crescent and star, which are clearly associated with the Islamic tradition of the Sultanate, one of the most significant parts of the design of the insignia is represented by a double saber. It symbolises the legendary bifurcated (double) saber or sword of Ali, given to him by his father-in-law, the Prophet Muhammad.
Membership
The privilege of Membership is conferred, at the Sultan’s pleasure, upon those who have performed worthy and meritorious service in support of the Royal House of Sulu. It is also conferred upon those of any nationality whom, in any field of endeavour, have become distinguished and respected figures of international renown and are deemed worthy of such recognition.
Notable Members of the Order
Dom Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza of Portugal
King Yuhi VI Bushayija of Rwanda
King Kigeli V Ndahindurwa of Rwanda
Archduke Josef Karl von Habsburg of Austria
King William Wilberforce Gabula Nadiope IV of Busoga-Uganda
King Rukirabasaija Agutamba Solomon Iguru I of Bunyoro-Kitara-Uganda
Prince Davit Bagrationi Mukhrani Batonishvili of Georgia
Prince Ermias Sahle-Selassie of Ethiopia
Prince Alexandar Pavlov Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia
Prince Karl Vladimir Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia
Princess Jelisaveta Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia
Princess Brigitta Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia
Princess Margaret of Hohenberg
Princess Owana Salazar of Hawaii
Crown Prince Kalokuokamaile III of Hawaii
Prince Osman Rifat Ibrahim of Egypt
Princess Mahera Hassan of Afghanistan
Princess Luciana Pallavicini Hassan of Afghanistan
Prince Mohsin Ali Khan of Hyderabad
Prince Maurizio Ferrante Gonzaga, Marquis of Vescovato, Marquis of Vodice
Duke Don Diego de Vargas Machuca, Marquis of Vatolla
Prince Guglielmo Giovanelli Marconi of the Princes Giovanelli
Lord Abdul Mateen Pelham, 8th Earl of Yarborough
President Lech Walesa of Poland
Dr. Pier Felice degli Uberti, 15th Baron of Cartsburn
Michel Teillard d’Eyry of the International Academy for Genealogy
Michael Medvedev of the Heraldic Council of the President of Russia
Stanislav Dumin, Master Herald of Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna of Russia
Ambassador Paolo Borin of the Sovereign Miltary Order of Malta
Consul Philippe May of St. Vincent and the Grenadines in Singapor
Heraldry
Members of the Order have specific heraldic regulations related to how to display their insignia with their coat of arms. Permission to display their insignia is granted via the office of the Gateway Chronicler King of Arms that also regulates all heraldry for the Royal House of Sulu. The rules are as follows:
Members of the paramount class of the Pearl Collar may encircle their arms with the Collar of the Order. If, for some exceptional reasons, the specific oval badge and riband of this grade are displayed instead of the Collar, a golden flame may be added above the badge.
Members of the class of the Grand Cordon may adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge and display the riband of the Order fastened with a bow from which the badge is suspended, whereas the riband may encircle the shield either completely or partially.
Members of the class of the Distinguished Companion may adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge and display the ribbon of the Order, each half displayed separately, whereas the ribbon may encircle the shield either completely or partially. The ribbon may be shown with loose ends issuant from behind the shield and may display a flame above the insignia and is entitled to the Order’s star.
Members of the class of the Companion may adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge and display the ribbon of the Order, each half displayed separately, whereas the ribbon may encircle the shield either completely or partially. The ribbon may be shown with loose ends issuant from behind the shield. Membership in this grade does not entitle members to supporters.
Members of the class of the Officer may adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge and display the ribbon of the Order, one half displayed covering the other. The ribbon is issuant from beneath the shield with optionally loose ends shown issuant from behind the shield. Optionally, the buckle may be shown above the ribbon. Membership in this grade does not entitle members to supporters.
Members of the class of the Member may adorn their shield with the Order’s uncrowned badge and display the ribbon of the Order, one half displayed covering the other. The ribbon is issuant from beneath the shield with optionally loose ends shown issuant from behind the shield. Optionally, the buckle may be shown above the ribbon. Membership in this grade does not entitle members to supporters.
The two senior most ranks are entitled to supporters in a way of grant or of certification. A widow of a Companion who did not obtain supporters but was entitled to them, may apply in his name.
Grades of the Order
The Royal Order of the Pearl is awarded by the Sultan in six grades with the following post-nominal letters. Moving from the most senior to the most junior grade they are:
Royal Companion (RCPS)
Grand Cordon (GCPS)
Distinguished Companion (DCPS)
Companion (CPS)
Officer (OPS)
Member (MPS)
Those admitted in the grade of Royal Companion shall only be members of the Sultan’s family and other recognized royal families across the globe.
No specific nobility titles are awarded to members of the Order but those belonging in the senior grades of Distinguished Companion and Grand Cordon are permitted to use honorifics within the Order. These are “The Honourable” and “His/Her Excellency” respectively.
Some eminent members who have exceptionally served the people of Sulu have been ennobled as senior nobles of the Sultanate. They are bestowed the nobility title of “Datu Sadja” exclusively granted by the Sultan at his pleasure
Heraldic Privileges
HERALDIC PRIVILEGES OF THE ROYAL AND HASHEMITE ORDER OF THE PEARL
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl is a dynastic order of honour of the Royal House of Sulu, under the headship of His Majesty Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram.
At another time, I plan on writing a dedicated article on this particular Royal House, it’s fascinating history and its heraldid insignia & rules. This article is dedicated to the heraldic rules related to the Royal Order mentioned in the title.
However, before we get into the details, a brief introduction into the Order of the Pearl is necessary.
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl was founded in June of 2011. Membership into the Order is conferred only upon the approval of His Majesty The Sultan in his capacity of the Grand Sayyid of the Order. The Order is not literally an Order of Chivalry and its members are not formally called Knights, because specific noble ranks and definitions, equal to those of Knighthood but more appropriate for the Tausug context, are established for the members of the Order.
There are 6 total grades in the Order:
Royal Companion of the Pearl Collar
Grand Cordon
Distinguished Companion
Companion
Officer
Member
Royal Companion of the Pearl Collar
A note should be made here that the Pearl Collar is highly restricted and limited to 24 Knights. This grade is also conferred upon members of the Royal Family of Sulu and foreign heads of royal families as well as heads of state but these are supernumerary knights and do not count towards the limit. The heir to the headship of the Royal House is a supernumerary knight by right of birth.
In reviewing the statutes of the Order, the following are the rules for each grade:
These knights may encircle their arms with the Pearl Collar of the Order.
If, for some exceptional reasons, the specific oval badge and riband of this grade are displayed instead of the Collar, a golden flame may be added above the badge.
Allows the petition for supporters from the Gateway Chronicler King of Arms.
Grand Cordon
Adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge.
Display the riband of the Order fastened with a bow from which the badge is suspended.
The riband may encircle the shield either completely or partially.
Allows the petition for supporters from the Gateway Chronicler King of Arms.
Adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge.
Display the ribbon of the Order, each half displayed separately.
The ribbon may encircle the shield either completely or partially.
The ribbon may be shown with loose ends issuant from behind the shield.
May display a flame above the insignia and is entitled to the Order’s star.
Distinguished Companion
Officer
Adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge.
Display the ribbon of the Order, one half displayed covering the other (as seen above).
The ribbon is issuant from beneath the shield with optionally loose ends shown issuant from behind the shield.
Optionally, the buckle may be shown above the ribbon.
Membership in this grade does not entitle knights to supporters.
Officer
Member
Adorn their shield with the Order’s crowned badge.
Display the ribbon of the Order, one half displayed covering the other (as seen above).
The ribbon is issuant from beneath the shield with optionally loose ends shown issuant from behind the shield.
Optionally, the buckle may be shown above the ribbon.
Membership in this grade does not entitle knights to supporters.
Those in the two senior most ranks are entitled to supporters in a way of grant or of certification. A widow of a companion who did not obtain supporters but was entitled to them, may apply in his name.
Certain artistic liberties may be allowed; thus, if supporters with a compartment are included into the achievement of a member or an officer, the ribbon may pass behind the compartment rather than the shield. In any case of a doubt, the King of Arms’ consultation may be useful.
There is a honourable category of members jure sanguinis who are entitled to a special distinction, the olden representation of the Royal badge of kris and spear to be added either above the Order’s badge (Members, Officers) or as a part of the badge (Companions, Distinguished Companions, Grand Cordon). The paramount class is listed above this category, and the Royal badge forms a part of the collar.
The category of jure sanguinis is only open to those that are born as Datu of Sulu.
These rules apply to the members both sexes.
Although the heraldic images of the insignia of the Order must be recognizable, no photographic preciseness in reproduction of the original items is required; graphic liberties are allowed and even welcome to stress the symbolic value of the insignia’s elements. The liberty of display of the Collar already practiced by His Majesty The Sultan is to be seen as an example.
The ribbon of the Order is dark green, edged with two narrow stripes alternating blue and white on each side. The ribbon of the paramount class is plain green with colorfully ornamented ends, but typically this element is not included into achievements.
The Chronicler King of Arms, the senior most rank in the heraldic structure of the Sultanate of Sulu, is the principle herald of the Order of the Pearl.
HE PEARL KNIGHTS
Dedicated to His Royal Majesty Paduka Mahasari Al-Maulana Ampun Sultan Hadji Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram ibni Almarhum Sultan Mohammad Mahakuttah Abdulla Kiram, The 35th Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo
Written by H.E. Aleksandar Bachko, GCPS
Although The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl was formally established in June 2011, it is an institution whose roots are much deeper. When the current Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo, His Royal Majesty Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram decided to establish the Order, using His sovereign right as “fons honorum”, it was uniting the royal, nobiliary and chivalrous traditions of the Sultanate, in a manner appropriate for international standards.
Тhis matter will be further discussed. However, firstly we will analyze the name of this Order.
Almost from the beginning of human civilization, the pearl has represented something very precious, but at the same time something sophisticated and rare. Symbolism of the pearl is very significant. It is mentioned in many of ancient writings. Sacred books of great world religions, including Christianity, Islam and Hinduism, mention pearl, usually as a symbol of great value.
For the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, the pearl is even more important than for most other countries. On the islands of the Sulu Archipelago, pearls are collected for centuries in the traditional way. It is believed, that pearls from Sulu are the most valuable in the world. For centuries, only the Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo had the right to possess the largest and most valuable pearls found in the archipelago. Although penalties for violators of this law were very harsh, some exceptional pieces found their way to Europe and other destinations by secret channels. Pearls are also of great importance for this country because, for a long time, they are one of the pillars of its economy.
The term “Hashemite” in the title of the Order has its roots in the very foundations of the Kiram dynasty, as well as the history of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo. This term refers to the ancient Arab clan Hashemites, descendants of Hashim. It is a branch of a larger tribe, the Quraish. From the Hashemite clan originated the Prophet Muhammad himself, his daughter Fatima and her husband Ali, the most important personalities of Islam. The roots of this clan are in the region Hejaz in today’s Saudi Arabia, near the Red Sea.
In the narrow sense, Hashemites are descendants of the Prophet Muhammad through his daughter Fatima and her husband Ali. Fatima and Ali had more children, but it is known that four of them came to maturity. These were sons Hasan ibn Ali and Husayn ibn Ali, and daughters Zaynab and Umm Kulthum. Descendants of Fatima and Ali are bearing honorary titles Sayyid (master) and the Sharif (noble).
Some important dynasties of the Islamic world developed from the old clan Hashemites. Among them were the former Dynasties of: Hejaz Kingdom, Syria, North Yemen and Iraq. Shаrifs of Mecca had same origins. Current Royal Houses of Jordan and Morocco are also of Hashemite origin.
The Royal House of Kiram of Sulu and North Borneo is one of the Dynasties that have Hashemite ancestry. In the first half of the 15th century Sayyid Abubakar Abirin, a prominent explorer and Islamic religious teacher, came to Sulu. He was born in Johor on the Malay Peninsula, and he was of Arabic, respectively of Hashemite origin. He married Princess Paramisuli and about 1450, after the death of his father in law Raja Baguinda, he founded the Sultanate of Sulu. Sayyid Abubakar Abirin’s regal name was Sharif ul – Hashim. The present Royal House of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, Kiram, descends from him.
As mentioned, Hashemites in the narrow sense of the word, or descendants of the Prophet Muhammad through his daughter Fatima, have the right to bear the title Sayyid. In accordance with the traditions of his country, and his Hashemite origin, His Majesty The Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo, bears the title of the Grand Sayyid of the The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl. It is the appropriate title for this function of His Majesty, because it is equivalent to the traditional title of the Grand Master of the Order in English language.
Title of Sultan is certainly one of the most important and most frequent royal titles in countries with deeply rooted Islamic traditions. This title comes from the Arabic language and is derived from the term “sultah”, meaning “authority” or “power”. In the region of Sulu archipelago it has been present since the mid-15th century. His Royal Majesty Ampun Hadji Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram is the 35th Sultan of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo.
The term “Fons Honorum” (fount of honour) means a person who, by his/her position, has the sovereign right of giving legitimate titles of nobility, or membership in the knightly orders, to other people. These are, therefore, persons who are either rulers of states, heads of dynasties, or leaders of traditional (old) religious organizations. By the establishment of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl, His Majesty Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram used this sovereign right as the Sultan of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, as well as the Head of the Royal House of Kiram.
Besides the symbolism regarding the name, the insignia of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl also contain a certain symbolic significance. On the insignia of this Order (collar, badges, stars, rosettes and miniatures) are elements of the coat of arms of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo: double saber, pearl, crescent, star and crown.
Besides the crescent and star, which are clearly associated with Islamic tradition of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, one of the most significant parts of insignia of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl is represented by double saber, probably Zulfiqar. This symbol is also represented at Coat of Arms of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo. It is a legendary bifurcated (double) saber or sword of Ali, given to him by his father-in-law, Prophet Muhammad. Zulfiqar is, among other things, a symbol of sharp distinction between right and wrong.
The symbolism of the pearls for Sulu is already mentioned. The crown on the insignia of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl represents ruler’s dignity of the Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo. On the breast star of the Order appears the mythical animals (semi tiger – semi fish), which are also supporters of the shield on the Greater Coat of Arms of the Sultanate.
The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl is divided into several grades. Highest grade, Royal Companion, is reserved exclusively for members of the current and former royal houses. Beside this, there are five more grades in the Order: Grand Cordon, Distinguished Companion, Companion, Officer and Member. This ranking to some extent resembles the ranking of traditional nobility and privileged classes of society in the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo (Datu, Tuan, etc.), but also the European Royal Orders of Chivalry. Membership in the Order can only be acquired in accordance with the wish and the approval of its Grand Sayyid (Grand Master). With this dynastic Order its Grand Sayyid rewards persons of all nationalities and religions, which were particularly meritorious concerning service, deeds and faithfulness to the Royal House and the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, as well as those, who gained an outstanding international reputation in their field of activity.
Among the members of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl there are some leading figures from other royal families, as well as scientists, artists, and other prominent individuals. These include: HM King (Omukama) Solomon Iguru I of Bunyoro-Kitara; HM King Kigeli V of Rwanda; HRH Duarte Pio, Duke of Braganza, “de jure” King of Portugal; HRH Davit Bagrationi Mukhran, Crown Prince of Georgia; HIH Prince Ermias Sahle Selassie of Ethiopia; HIRH Archduke Joseph Karl von Habsburg; HRH Princess Margaret von Hohenberg; HRH Prince Aleksandar Pavlov Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia; HRH Prince Vladimir Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia; HRH Princess Jelisaveta Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia; HRH Princess Brigitta Karageorgevich of Serbia and Yugoslavia; HRH Princess Luciana Pallavicini Hassan of Afghanistan; HRH Princess Mahera Hassan of Afghanistan; HRH Prince Osman Rifat Ibrahim of Egypt and Turkey, HH Prince Mohsin Ali Khan of Hyderabad; HRH Princess Dr. Chao Duangduen of Chiang Mai and many other prominent members of the Order.
Although, in accordance with tradition and spirit of the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo, The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl is not officially called an order of chivalry, it is certainly the knightly order of the Royal House, from a European point of view. Concerning this, the writer of these lines should not be criticized for authorial freedom, to call members of The Royal and Hashemite Order of the Pearl – “The Pearl Knights”.
MEMBERSHIP
Membership in the Order of the Pearl is a lifelong award of honour and is by invitation only.
Nominations and petitions for membership are welcome but are subject to different regulatory procedures. Please note that membership is only available through official channels represented in the Royal Chancellery. Any other means are unauthorized.
Serbia Asst. Representative: H.E. Aleksandar Backo, GCPS
Sweden: H.E. Datu Sadja Christian Blank, GCPS
U.S.A.: H.E. Datu Sadja Jaeame I. Koyil, GCPS
PART6: Law of Succession of sulu
The law of primogeniture is strictly followed in the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo.
His Royal Majesty Ampun Sultan Hadji Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram, The 35th Sultan of Sulu and North Borneo, Head of the Royal House of Sulu
H.M. SULTAN MUEDZUL-LAIL TAN KIRAM WITH H.M. DAYANG PANGIAN MELLANY KIRAM AND RAJA MUDA MOHD. EHSN KIRAM ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2012 AT DARUL JAMBANGAN, MAIMBUNG, SULU
CORONATION OF H.M. SULTAN MUEDZUL-LAIL TAN KIRAM ON 16 SEPTEMBER 2012 AT DARUL JAMBANGAN, MAIMBUNG, SULU
Sultan Mohammad Mahakuttah Abdulla Kiram (1974 – 1986)
SULTAN MOHAMMED ESMAIL ENANG KIRAM (PROCLAIMED IN 1936 THEN OFFICIALLY REIGNED FROM 1950-1974)
SULTAN BADARUDDIN II (1881-1884)
Sultan Jamalul Kiram II (1894-1936)
SULTAN MOHAMMAD Pulalun Kiram (1844-1862)
SULTAN JAMALUL A’LAM (1862-1881)
REGENT AD INTERIM SULTANS IMPOSED UNDER AMERICAN COLONIZATION AND JAPANESE OCCUPATION (1936-1950)
SULTAN MUWALLIL WASIT II – 1936
Part 7: The Philippines’ Sulu Sultanate That Dominated Maritime Trade For Centuries | The Mark Of Empire
Part 8: WHAT IS MODERATE CONSERVATISM? WHAT ARE ITS CHARACTERISTICS OR DIFFERENCES FROM TRADITIONAL CONSERVATIVES?
Moderate conservatism is a form of conservatism that combines traditional conservative principles—such as limited government, free markets, and respect for established institutions—with a pragmatic, flexible, and often less dogmatic approach to social and political change. It acts as a middle-ground political stance, aiming for stability while accepting that gradual, orderly change is sometimes necessary for societal progress.
Characteristics of Moderate Conservatism Moderate conservatives tend to share a philosophy that focuses on practical results rather than rigid ideological purity
Pragmatism over Dogma: Moderate conservatives are willing to compromise, preferring to “get things done” rather than holding out for ideological perfection.
Cautious Change: While traditionalists resist change, moderate conservatives accept it, provided it is well-thought-out, gradual, and not a reactive response to novel ideas.
Fiscal Responsibility & Market Capitalism: They support pro-growth tax policies and free markets, but may accept some government regulation to ensure stability.
Respect for Institutions: They hold respect for established institutions like the church, family, and rule of law, often prioritizing legal order and stability.
“Moderate” Social Views: Unlike traditionalists, moderate conservatives might not push for strict legislation on every social issue, often preferring to avoid intense “culture wars”.
Differences Between Moderate and Traditional Conservatives The primary difference lies in flexibility and the “purism” of their ideological commitment.
Approach to Compromise: Traditional/Hard-line conservatives are more likely to refuse to compromise on core principles, even if it prevents legislation from passing. Moderate conservatives view compromise as necessary for governing.
Role of Government: Traditionalists often advocate for a minimal state across the board. Moderate conservatives are more likely to accept a social safety net, such as Medicare or Social Security, as necessary, particularly in a modern context.
Change Management: Traditionalists, often associated with Edmund Burke’s skepticism of change, tend to prefer looking backward to precedent, whereas moderate conservatives are more willing to look forward, provided the change is managed safely.
Culture War Involvement: Traditional conservatives are often driven by a strong desire to preserve specific traditional social values, sometimes through legal imposition. Moderate conservatives often prefer to stay out of intense social disputes, focusing more on economic and constitutional stability.
THE SULTANATE OF SULU UNDER SULTAN MUEDZUL LAIL TAN KIRAM AND HIS HEIRS BELIEVES IN THE IMPORTANCE OF THESE THREE: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE.
Shem is one of the Official Social Media Admin (OSMA) of HRM Sultan Muedzul-Lail Tan Kiram , De Jure 35th monarch of The Royal House of Sulu . Sultan Muedzul is the Raha Muda (Crown Prince) of Mohammed Mahakuttah Abdullah Kiram (reigned 1974–1986) the last titular Sultan of Sulu officially recognized by the government of the Philippines during Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974 Sulu coronation. Sultan Muedzul is the successor of the 34th monarch and also one of the legal heirs or present day descendants (1 of the inheritors of Sabah Private Lease agreement) as confirmed or in accordance to the McCaskie Court Decision Year 1939.
“Monarchism as an ideology and form or way of thinking, living or governance had its own Pros and Cons (just like any other ideology)…but always choose the most practical that most of the time will result in unity, continuity, stability and non partisanship. A form of government inspired by both the divine and human inspirations and aspirations. A “hereditary principle” that is inspired by the universal truths that encompass all faith, languages, race, tribes and borders. Monarchy and being a true monarchist (Constitutional and Absolutist depends on you) is the only sole option a country can have. You still have time to elect or crown a hereditary head of state.” -Shemuel Gallardo Vivar
Tge real life crown prince of Sulu. The current 35th De jure monarch of Lupah Sug. Son & Raha Muda (crown prince) of the last government recognized 34th monarch of Sulu archipelago. Reference: ‘Presidential Order Memorandum 427 Year 1974’ -source: The Official Philippine Gazette ( -Google). #irrevocable#arbitration#award#philippines#sulu#monarchy#thekingdom Sana after ng #thekingdommff2024 , meron din movie adaptation ng life story ni sultan Muedzul #thekingdommff
“The role of a monarch in the modern world is to protect the people from the politicians” – Franz Josef I ( 18 August 1830 – 21 November 1916), Emperor of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire
.jpg)
Critics, posers or bashers are just like the mythical Vampires of old lore. They can only enter your house (or life) once you invite them or let them go through the door.
: 
